Happy New Year’s Eve, everyone.
Wanted to address a few other issues:
Shadowfax comments that perhaps the retainer medicine trend will be a driver of change, saying that in order for change to happen to health care payments and financing, “physicians need to take the hard and painful step of saying, No, I wont see you, to Medicare patients. And that is basically what concierge care is.”
I don’t think this approach that Shadowfax mentions is the right one. There’s a reason that every year, doctors are chosen by Americans as the most trusted profession. Despite some may think of us, they know we work our asses off to care for them. We dedicate our lives to the task. We embody the definition of the true professional: the person that puts the needs of his or her patient ahead of his or her own. We lose that trust from our patients–that we have their interests ahead of our own–and we risk losing much more than just money. (And ignoring economic theory of medical school being an investment in later higher salaries, when you look at it from the average American’s perspective, making $38,000 a year, doctors complaining about only making $150,000 a year will look pretty ridiculous to most of the US.)
I also fail to understand why physicians would be willing to “protest” by joining retainer/concierge practices yet still work within the current health care non-system than “protest” for reforming the entire health care system. Not to go all single-payer on you, but those hundreds of billions of dollars (we can argue if it’s $300B or $100B later) wasted on administrative duplication and entire billing departments in hospitals and clinics sure seem like a great pot of money that we could pay primary care physicians with. Call me crazy. Many do.
And as I’d mentioned before, Josh has been writing a lot about concierge medicine at KevinMD. One post shows a sample practice with a huge reduction in hospital admissions for concierge care-managed patients. That’s great! Fantastic! Awesome! Amazing! I have no doubt that it’s true. If you can spend more time with your patients and watch them closer, you can keep them out of the hospital. Which is good for the patients and great for our health care system. But why should we only provide this to the rich patients (yes, the overwhelming majority of these concierge patients are wealthy) that can afford it? Why not fix our whole health care system so that the diabetic gets a 45 minute visit instead of a 15 minute one?
We’re having a great debate on the subject of retainer/concierge/whatever medicine, starting with piece by Dr. Centor, an internist I high respect. I fired back this piece and now Dr. Centor has responded. I must give Josh at KevinMD some credit for getting the debate started (but please Josh, post about something else now and then!).
We’ll go through Dr. Centor’s response piece by piece, ’cause I find it’s the best way to address points and give my own thoughts.
Graham is an idealistic 5th year med student (he spent a year doing research.)
Guilty, yes, as charged. I actually describe myself as an “idealist realist” (or “realistic idealist,” take your pick) in that I believe we can always strive to do better and improve: that we should always aim for and want the best. But I grudgingly accept and recognize that reality don’t always jive with that aim. Moving right along.
Upon further reflection, one must evaluate the current status of outpatient internal medicine (because currently the great majority of retainer practices are internal medicine.) Physicians are fleeing from outpatient internal medicine. Our current reimbursement model causes physicians to run on a treadmill, destroys their work life balance, and leads to a constant sense that they are delivering substandard care.
Look at our residents. Very few choose outpatient medicine these days. They either choose subspecialties or hospitalist jobs.
Look at practicing outpatient internists. They are leaving practice at a steady rate. Some switch to hospital medicine. Some go back to do fellowships. Some leave medicine entirely.
I totally agree with you, Dr. Centor. We joke that all the medicine residents at Stanford are going into either Cardiology or GI, because it sure seems that way.
Dr. Centor goes on to talk about the financial disincentives to work in primary care: the poor reimbursement due to third-party payers, the inability to spend the time truly needed with a diabetic, etc. Again, we’re in fully agreement here. I really like this bit:
Most outpatient physicians practice medicine in a way that insidiously harms their self esteem. They know that they are not providing the best care. They know that they cannot provide their patients with the support that they really need.
I believe that most retainer physicians see their practice style as the only tenable solution. I suspect that many of them would have left practice for another job if they did not have this option.
If retainer physicians are unethical, then what about physicians who quit seeing patients entirely and enter medical administration. What about any variety of subspecialists?
And this is where I think Dr. Centor and I are missing each other. My concerns are those from more of a public healthy, health policy lens, whereas Dr. Centor is viewing the situation from an equally valid perspective–that of the primary care doc on the front lines. He makes a great point: if the decision for the primary care physician is between retainer medicine and giving up medicine, that makes the choice seem more reasonable to me. And I have no doubt that many primary care docs believe they simply aren’t able to deliver high-quality care to their patient census. And speaking of ethics, I’m certainly in the guilty field here, as I’m not going into primary care (although I’ll be doing my share of ‘primary care’ in the Emergency Department and seeing uninsured patients, something I love about the field).
Dr. Centor then goes on to talk about how if retainer medicine succeeds, perhaps it will encourage more residents to go into primary care, which would achieve the goals of more primary care physicians in the US.
But hold on here, let’s give my perspective a look with some back of the envelope math. According to the 2006 Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we have
109,400 Family and General Practitioners in the US, and 48,700 General Internists in the US. That’s 158,100 primary care doctors in the US. With about 28% of the US being under 20, that leaves 236,000,000 adults that need a primary care physician. That’s almost 1,500 people per physician.
Say we even took all the physicians in the US–415,630–and told every single one they have to practice primary care. We divide it up again, and it’s still 567 patients per physician.
Let’s be practical here, people–retainer medicine will not work as a model to fix primary care. It will certainly make primary care physicians’ lives better and their wallets thicker (which I’m not opposed to), but it simply won’t fix the problem.
Dr. Centor, the ball’s back in your court.
PS: “Single payer systems do not provide social justice.” Huh? They are certainly far from perfect, but certainly do a better job of providing limited resources equally to all citizens than, say, our system.
Not sure how much of this is a true increase, but there may be a particularly nasty virus going around that usually just causes the common cold, known as Adenovirus 14. There’s a JAMA report out from the CDC about it just yesterday; it seems to be causing pretty severe illness in even the young and healthy, putting an 18 year-old in the ICU in Oregon.
Please, wash your hands–no matter if you’re sick or well–before eating, after using the bathroom, before touching your face, all that. And if you’re sick, well, I’m sorry. And that’s what sick days are for. Rest up and get well soon.
I thought this was lost forever to Microsoft’s stupid Publisher format, but thanks to PDF Online’s awesome and free Convert-to-PDF program, I’m able to pass it on to the future generation. (Ha!)
Since this is about the time that I technically started preparing for boards (translation: I taught myself biochem, nothing else), and I was talking to my friend John, I figured I might as well post this before I forget about it. The basic deal: during our “prep for clinics month,” I would casually review subjects I felt the least comfortable with for a couple hours a night. For my 5 weeks of boards studying, I’d spend 8-12 hours a day studying the subject listed on the calendar. I spent two weeks reviewing everything by system, and then I reviewed everything a second time for the next two weeks, re-learning it by subject again. 5 weeks is the clear maximum. My sweet spot was 4.5 weeks, as I started to lose it at about day 30 or 31. The motivational crap at the top was just to try to push me that extra little step–we took a family trip to Mexico the week after I finished boards, which was really great.
And now, without further ado (and please forgive the language, which I’ve blocked out):
Graham’s Boards Step 1 Calendar!